Fear of prosecution drives age-players undergound

In Yongchon, there was a school made by a Lolita McAllister, that catered to only men who were interested in having sex with a person pretending to be a girl of the ages 12 and under. For the past few months a good friend of mine has been AR'ed people claiming to be 12 or under there. Here are some conversations (all with girls from the same location that Lolita McAllister is running):

[15:46] (my friend): Hello, how old are you
[15:46] Darren Tani: Hi! Fine thank u
[15:46] (my friend): I said, how old are you.
[15:46] (my friend): Age.
[15:47] Darren Tani: 12
[15:47] Darren Tani: ill b 13 in august
[15:47] (my friend): Do you realize only adults are allowed in SL?
[15:47] Darren Tani: did u know this is ageplay at this location
[15:47] (my friend): I'm going to send you to a Linden who'd help you off this grid.
[15:47] (my friend): Advertisement of sexual ageplay is illegal.

...

[0:41] (my friend): Do you act any age under 18?
[0:41] Sox Ochs: yes if you like i can be what you want me to be xx
[0:42] (my friend): Are you aware this is a bannable offense within Second Life?
[0:42] Sox Ochs: no
[0:42] Sox Ochs: i wasnt aware
[0:43] Sox Ochs: 16 is ok i think
[0:43] (my friend): No.
[0:43] Sox Ochs: im in the uk xx
[0:43] (my friend): This is Second Life, you cannot be sexual at 16.
[0:43] Sox Ochs: its legal
[0:43] (my friend): It's the policy, 18+.
[0:43] (my friend): You did read the notecard near you right?

...

[15:56] Lynn Negulesco: im as old as u want me to be, hehehe
[15:56] (my friend): how old is that
[15:56] (my friend): roughly
[15:57] Lynn Negulesco: lol, most of my clients ask for me to be between 12 to 14
[15:57] (my friend): you are in the US?
[15:57] Lynn Negulesco: but personnally
[15:57] (my friend): um do you charge?
[15:57] Lynn Negulesco: i can change ages
[15:57] Lynn Negulesco: yes i do
[15:57] (my friend): how much
[15:58] Lynn Negulesco: 600 15 mins, 100 for 30 mins
[15:58] Lynn Negulesco: 1000*
[15:58] (my friend): what age do you like to be?
[15:59] Lynn Negulesco: meh, it makes me happy knowing what age the client want me to be
[15:59] (my friend): One sec
[15:59] Lynn Negulesco: so waht ever age want, i will like it
[15:59] Lynn Negulesco: ok
[15:59] (my friend): You are aware that sexual ageplaying as minor is illegal within SL and considered pedophillic in most western nations?
[16:00] (my friend): That I'm to report you to LL for violation of rules.
[16:00] (my friend): Plus the fact you have been escorting is real bad.

My friend asked this question to many people posing as little girls in the place given above and every single person gave an age under 14 and suggested payment. This is all run by the Madame called Lolita McAllister. (Yeah weirdo you could have found a less obvious name).

All these people lived around this land owned by Lolita McAllister. There used to be a huge sign there which had the note card referring to the new Linden Labs policy on age-play. But that doesn't stop these people from soliciting sex as minors (usually for 1000+ Lindens).

Today, I went to see what was up with this place. Their name has changed, it's still called School, but anything pointing to their real activity (sex with people pretending to be 10 yr old girls) has been taken out.



So have they reformed? I thought they had. When I zoomed in closer I saw a bunch of people including a Jonathan Scamper (with some slaves by his feet) and a Barns Balhaus (looking like a 13-14 yr old) and some other age-players including the owner of the land. It's quite apparent that they have not stopped their activities and that what used to go on out in the open is still happening.



Just for LULZ, I msg'ed Barns Balhaus and asked her what her age was, she claims she's 12 (with a über sexual profile and ready for escorting for Ms. Lolita her owner).




Right after that she cleared her profile (My friend mentioned that other age-players also did this ). Kinda amusing cause they have no concept of screenshots or um logs in teh Linden Lab HQ?!

I also sent an IM to Jonathan Scamper and asked him why he's involved in this, he couldn't quite answer my question and kept asking me to show myself to him, (by when I was pretty far away). Anyways, he claims to be an owner of underage (role playing of course) slaves and one of his way of making money in SL is pimping these sorry retards off. There is your daily sickness.


Update:

Jonathan Scamper msgs me back to clear his name (sorta), he said his slave was not underage. But yeah he works for Ms. McAllister. He also mentioned a very interesting thing. Ms. McAllister was banned by Linden Labs recently for the same thing I just blogged about, she had just come back to SL.

It's interesting she'd come back and go into pedophilia right away. Oh well.

[10:21] Jonathan Scamper: My slave is not underage and nore does she pretend too be, your perception of what you think looks young and what they say are two different oppinions
[10:24] Honey Wendt: What was a respectable person like you doing in a pedophilic area?
[10:26] Jonathan Scamper: going in too clean it up, but you don't care do you, you see a place and you assume I am apart of it. do you care too ask if I am able too ban people off the land no, do you care too ask my personal slave if she plays young or not, no, you assume things about me because I am here trying too clean up this joint , but instead you slander my name. and there has no proof of me supporting this child crap. all you can say is I asked where you were too have you show me these god awefull pics so I can have the mremoved, but no you assume I want them instead of show them.
[10:27] Honey Wendt: Mr. Scamper, you were role playing in that area.
[10:29] Honey Wendt: You can post what you just wrote as a reply to my blog, or I'll cut and paste this as areply if you like
[10:30] Jonathan Scamper: I was sitting around talking with my slave.
[10:30] Jonathan Scamper: that is all
[10:30] Jonathan Scamper: but you chose too not have them or me know where they were so I could remove them
[10:31] Honey Wendt: Did you not at any time realize you were with a group of people who age-played (sexually) children?
[10:31] Jonathan Scamper: yes after her account was closed
[10:32] Honey Wendt: Who's account?
[10:32] Jonathan Scamper: the boss
[10:32] Honey Wendt: I mean looking at those names, lolita etc..
[10:32] Honey Wendt: Her account is already closed?
[10:32] Jonathan Scamper: after it was closed we changed things too make it legal place
[10:32] Jonathan Scamper: it was a temp closing too get her too change
[10:32] Jonathan Scamper: so she did
[10:32] Jonathan Scamper: that is why she is back
[10:32] Honey Wendt: Why's she back?
[10:33] Jonathan Scamper: so stop harassing us, Lindons thought she must have cleaned up or she wouldn't have
[10:33] Honey Wendt: But the stuff is still happening, Mr. Scamper, I asked a girl right near you how old she is and she said 12.
[10:33] Jonathan Scamper: it is that simple
[10:33] Honey Wendt: Are you with them?
[10:33] Jonathan Scamper: and now that she knows about it, I gave that post too lolita
[10:33] Jonathan Scamper: I can't controll what lolita won't do
[10:33] Jonathan Scamper: I can controll what is going on in front of me
[10:33] Honey Wendt: So she's still whoring these people who pretend to be 12?
[10:33] Jonathan Scamper: you forget she owns the land I do not
[10:34] Jonathan Scamper: no
[10:34] Jonathan Scamper: she isn't
[10:34] Jonathan Scamper: she has cleaned it up
[10:34] Honey Wendt: What is your relationship with this Lolita, if you dont mind me asking.
[10:34] Jonathan Scamper: tha tis why i posted that link too her
[10:34] Jonathan Scamper: so she can see who is still doing ot
[10:34] Jonathan Scamper: it
[10:34] Honey Wendt: Mr. Scamper, I looked around there are kid av's with sexual profiles right there.
[10:34] Honey Wendt: Working for Lolita McAllister.
[10:34] Jonathan Scamper: then that is an issue she must deal with,
[10:35] Jonathan Scamper: I am doing all I can too stop me from being wrong in your opinion, all I know is I am here too clean it up.
[10:35] Honey Wendt: The thing is, you said ([10:33] Jonathan Scamper: so stop harassing us, ) as refering to you and Ms. McAllister?
[10:36] Jonathan Scamper: when I said us, yes i meant her and me, because she has shown me so far that she will ban anyone pretending too be 12, now if the girls you have in that blog don't change there attitude or stop saying they are 12 when they are not, then yea I would leave, but I am giving my friend the benifit. she has cleaned up allot.
[10:37] Jonathan Scamper: so that is why I said stop harassing us
[10:37] Honey Wendt: Was that girl Barns banned?
[10:37] Jonathan Scamper: i do not have the ban list
[10:37] Honey Wendt: On your profile, Ms. McAllister is the first person listed.
[10:37] Jonathan Scamper: I don't own the land
[10:37] Honey Wendt: You were role playing though :) Only one person can own the land, but many can do things on it.
[10:37] Honey Wendt: But this isn't about the land right?
[10:38] Jonathan Scamper: she is the first person listed cause she is a friend "who is cleaning up the place
[10:38] Honey Wendt: This is about role playing under age and being associated with it.
[10:38] Jonathan Scamper: your asking me too tell you something I can not, you asked if she was on the ban list, I can't tell not being an owner you can't
[10:38] Honey Wendt: You worked for her right?
[10:38] Honey Wendt: As a security guard for escorts pretending to be 12.
[10:38] Jonathan Scamper: do I have too repeat yes, because I know now she is doing what she has too too stop what lindins don't wat
[10:39] Jonathan Scamper: *lol* no I didn't work as her security guard
[10:39] Honey Wendt: What did you work as?
[10:40] Jonathan Scamper: someone who signed up the girls and who was warning them each and everyone that they can not play child and gave them a note card from lindins themselves too each sign up, so too sit there and tell me that I agree with it all, is bull, when you haven't seen an example of my aplication proccess
[10:41] Honey Wendt: Like a pimp?
[10:41] Honey Wendt: Do you know the names of the girls listed on top of my blog entry?
[10:41] Jonathan Scamper: no like a fantasy where ADULT avatars can come and escort here
[10:41] Honey Wendt: Darren Tani, Sox Ochs, Lynn Negulesco
[10:42] Jonathan Scamper: I don't know if they have been banned or not, again what i wasn't aware of I can't report too lolita. now that she knows it is up too her too ban them cause I again don't have land rights
[10:43] Honey Wendt: Every single girl there claims to be around 12.
[10:43] Honey Wendt: Well, I usually send stories like this to various Lindens too, so that works pretty fast on banning.
[10:45] Jonathan Scamper: Well good, I am all for it, you think I am going too sit here and not agree that I think age play should be excepted no Hell no. I am all for anyone pretending too be younger than 18 too be known, what you say will help me out, so don't sit there and tell me I am not doing my part, and here is a copy of what i hand out all girls during there orientation.
[10:45] Jonathan Scamper: that is in dutch form
[10:45] Jonathan Scamper: so you even know I do it for anyone not speaking english too.
[10:46] Honey Wendt: Even though you hand that out (and I saw it in that land too) the girls are all dressed up as kids and seuxally age-play pre-teens.
[10:46] Honey Wendt: You want people to pretend to be younger than 18 sexually?
[10:46] Honey Wendt: About 10?
[10:47] Jonathan Scamper: if we beleive they are acting like children and "arn't small adults" then of course will do something about it. if we discriminate against dwarfs then I should die, dwarfs should be allowed too play themselves here too, they shouldn't have too be adult looking in height just because of some idiot who wants too beleive all short people are playing young
[10:48] Honey Wendt: Well thank you for your time. I have to go now.
[10:48] Jonathan Scamper: of course you do, too go slander more of this conversation in your blog
[10:49] Honey Wendt: Mr. scamper, it's an external private blog beloning to me, I can post anything I like there.
[10:50] Honey Wendt: I can't do that here, but I can there, you are free to write anything there as well as I do not censor.
[10:50] Jonathan Scamper: you do it too slander names of people who are not doing what you claim like me for example "bad taste, even if private
[10:52] Honey Wendt: Well, I try to tell the truth, I've gathered information on Ms. McAllister's little playground for months.
[10:53] Honey Wendt: You should be aware of this by seeing the logs posted.
[10:53] Honey Wendt: If there is any futher concern, I suggest you make a post. Thank you very much. And Goodbye.
[10:53] Jonathan Scamper: and yet nothing against me, but you still slander my name. I see your reporting is not pick out the good people, but rather the more people you can mention the better for your report

Update

I just googled for "Lolita McAllister", and found this little burb on TSO Enquirer:

AVIE CHILD PROSTITUTION IN SL?

Posted Thursday December 28, 2006

It has been reported that A Child Avie Prostitution Ring is Operatin in SL called The Girls School Clubhouse, Yongcho. Apparently it is run by a head Mistress named Lolita McAllister. According to one witness who visited the clubhouse , Lolita openly admitted that although all the prostitues were children, their RL Controllers were 18 and over. Needless to say, the Appauled Witness reported the Shameful Madame and the Clubhouse to Lindens on Wednesday December 27, 2006. They have yet to Reply... But we will keep you posted as soon as they do

Apparently this pedophile has been running a child av whore house since December, I wonder why Lindens allow someone like this to be within Second Life. This person shouldbe investigated and thrown into jail or a mental asylum.

So I was right about the CP getting LL in trouble

Linden Labs just posted a blog entry titled "Accusations regarding child pornography in Second Life", which is a detailed explanation of the little case that got Germany all fired up and have been pushing some of the first negative SL stories of the past few months. (Actually a torrent of stories as follows ... )

BBC
The Age
Mail & Guardian Online
Buzzle
Earthtimes.org
Telegraph.co.uk
Washington Post
Deutsche Welle
Ars Technica
Blogging Stocks
Inquirer
and many more...

All this I gathered while reading google's aggregated news service. Linden Labs has been very prompt to propose an age-verification service earlier this month due to this very case. They were totally tight lipped about the specifics of why this age-verification thing came into existence and in their haste they decided to go with a totally untested (and possibly quite deadly in terms of privacy) way of verifying our age and identity:

"We are in the process of implementing an improved electronic age verification system that will verify Residents’ ages by using different forms of identification, such as national identification numbers, passports, and social security numbers. This will enable us and our Residents to block mature content from anyone who has not affirmatively verified they are an adult."

The above is from their latest blog entry, in which they first came to terms with the real reason why this system was to be implemented:

On Thursday May 3, we were contacted by German television network, ARD, which had captured images of two avatars, one that resembled an adult male and another that resembled a child, engaged in depicted sexual conduct. Our investigations revealed the users behind these avatars to be a 54-year-old man and a 27-year-old woman. Both were immediately banned from Second Life.

So according to LL's logic, using their extremely obtrusive method of verifying your age can stop the above scenario from happening. Yes, and how would such a system stop a 54 year old man and a 27 year old woman from play fucking daddy/daughter? Jesus, someone hand LL a a big cookie and a glass of milk. Does anyone at LL have any brain cells left?

As much as I hate non-PG age-players (as apparent from my blog), I have to firmly state that verifying your age as being over 18 is not gonna stop the above from happening. LL further stated:

During a subsequent interview with ARD’s Report Mainz documentary on Friday May 4, which aired Monday, the reporter presented photographs that he said were found in Second Life and that appeared to include sexual photographs involving a child.

ARD reports that it has handed the images to a state attorney in Halle, Germany. Linden Lab has proactively attempted to contact the authorities, as is our practice if ever an image of child pornography is reported in Second Life, but has not received a response or any other contact from the German authorities.

Dear LL, have you ever checked out the child skins that are being sold in SL? LL, you know very well what photosourcing is and that for the past two years there has been complaints from your residents that those skins are made from real children and have genitalia of real children, and used by these sick age-players to do whatever they do. You have been telling us the whole time that it's simulated porn and not child pornography, I'm glad you are finally becoming aware of the difference between virtual and real.

Just go to any skin store that's selling child skins and you can find your CP there.

Update: Click the picture below to watch a German language video on child pornography within Second Life, it's worth just for the look on Robin Linden's face when she sees what is happening within her beloved Second Life.

Link to video (German and disturbing)

The secret gathering of virtual dykes.

For some strange reason, late last night I was accidental invited ("Honey" probably being a very common name in SL) to a secret gathering of an elite dyke conference. I had SL minimized most of the night, watching TV on Joost (free but stupid service), when all of a sudden, I noticed the SL program bar blinking. When I maximized it, I was reading pages of a virtual conferences to which I've been mistakenly invited.

Ahhh fun!

It appears that there is a secret cartel of virtual dykes living within Second Life, many of them are prominent members of the Second Life fashion and upper elite community. All of them were very worried about something that is affecting their virtual lives, and from the frantic scrolling of my conference window, I realized they were facing a crisis similar to that of the extinction of the dodo.

Being as silent as a mouse, I sat there and watched and read all that was written. At first I was trying to keep a straight face, but when I started understanding the topic of their discussion and the seriousness in which it was being debated, I couldn't help but burst into laughter.

This elite group of virtual lesbians had one real big issue. Linden Labs recently announced that Second Life as of 1.16 would include voice support, a feature that would be turned on by default. For some bizarre reason, this cartel of upper class elite dykes are all men, in real life. Their concern was that when voice support was enabled, they would have a very hard time explaining the 2-3 years of their virtual existence as hardcore female dykes to their in-game friends and partners. The seriousness in which this whole conference was debated nearly numbed me with hilarity. It appears some of them were even making plans to leave. And some others were coming up with various schemes to get around this new limitation.

The best line I heard was from one who said she would from now on tell people she was born deaf and mute.

I think we got a winner here.

I waited till everyone left the conference to close the window, so that no one would see "Honey Wendt has left the session" or the likes. But if you were one of the brilliant ladies in that conference, please feel free to send me an IM. I have no desire to post the full text of the conference or names involved.

PS: This is the second time this week that I've been mistakenly invited to a secret conference. I fumbled the first one by inquiring what it was all about, at which point all participants immediately left the conference.

Virtual Gender Bender

Linden labs to sell my personal information!!! YAY

On May 15 2007, the Linden Labs is going to demand every single user to give identification in the form of social security numbers, passports and drivers licences to a company called Aristotle.

The reason for doing this is apparently to stop minors from accessing (Second Life is strictly 18+), the majority of SL areas (which would automatically deny access to anyone who has not validated themsleves with Aristotle). And it doesn't matter if you're an adult and have been using SecondLife for 2 years with your credit card validation. They force you to submit all sorts of personal data to this Aristotle.



And who is Aristotle?

Why they are corrupt data selling horse fuckers. (PROOF)

Aristotle International used a website to sell the lists, which contain details about registered voters from nearly every state. The data includes birth dates, home addresses, phone numbers, race, income levels, ethnic backgrounds and, in some cases, religious affiliations.
...
But in reality, Aristotle's site allowed anyone to register and purchase lists under a phony name and address. The site asked only for a name, the state where the buyer resided, an e-mail address and a phone number. Fields for mailing address and company name were optional.
...
Sylvia Levy, a South Carolina voter whose data appeared on a list purchased by Wired News, said she was surprised to learn about the transaction.

"If I knew this, I would never have registered," she said. "This is very disturbing, and I'm very disappointed in the system."

And that was about RL voting. Now we are trusting our personal and private information with these con artists. What the fuck is Linden Labs thinking? Yeah wut?

I'm sure gonna trust LL and some marketing whores when Homeland Security and TSA are so cool on personal data.

I've been hearing from various people that LL is imposing this age verification (along with a ban on age-play due to pedophilic cases in Germany vs SL resis's).

Rock Vielle posted the following on the old forum :

Following the story that in Holland, the Dutch Prosecutor's Office is considering legal action against child porn in SL (http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/0...ual_child_porn/) and (http://buziaulane.blogspot.com/2007...first-life.html), and the blog concerning Rape Games (http://sparklematrix.wordpress.com/...e-games-update/), the sexual activity of some players in SL has again come under the spotlight with a recent German news broadcast, on ARD, again focussing on child porn (http://portal.gmx.net/de/themen/dig...55801RIaPy.html).

In Germany it is not only illegal to engage in paedophilia, but also to depict it in any way. Stories, pictures, cartoons etc depicting any of this is illegal. Circulating now in German porn shops are movies made inside SL showing sex between a child avi and an adult avi.

In Europe, the stories concerning SL are starting to become entrenched in people's minds that SL is a haven for paedophiles.

There is talk of another programme coming up, on BBC's Panorama, also depicting SL in this way. It is getting to the stage where, in Europe, who would admit to being in SL?

How many of these kind of news stories will it take before rl businesses and corporations desert SL in droves?

Is it time that all sexual activity in SL, which engages in role playing which is illegal in RL, such as Age Play (paedophilia), Rape Play (rape, abduction, sexual assault), Gorean Lifestyles (sexual slavery), even Furry Sex (bestiality) should be outlawed completely by SL, for the greater good of the majority of its residents?

How many more negative news stories can SL survive? How long before these sickoes spoil it for the rest of us?

Screenshot Dump

Age player promises to stalk me

Just a few hours ago, I randomly msged a Sunshine Garmes and gave her a link to the new Linden Lab policy on age-play. For some reason she got very agitated by this, the policy is clearly for those who engaged in sexual age-play, thus I found her reaction pretty hilarious. And since I had better things to do than debate this concept with her, I muted her (as she had a whole scroll of justification going on).

Then a few minutes later, a person by the name of Greg Cummings, IM's me.

This is the conversation.

[18:56] Greg Cummings: hey what is the problem with sunshine ? she not sick like that
[18:56] Honey Wendt: Who are you
[18:57] Greg Cummings: i am her boy friend in rl and in sl so she did nothing
[18:57] Honey Wendt: Did nothing? What are you going on about?
[18:57] Greg Cummings: i got the note card u sent her
[18:57] Honey Wendt: I did not send anyone a notecard.
[18:57] Honey Wendt: You are plainly mistaken.
[18:57] Greg Cummings: can i send it 2 u?
[18:58] Honey Wendt: What is it about?
[18:58] Greg Cummings: it shows ur name all over it
[18:58] Honey Wendt: My name?
[18:58] Greg Cummings: yes
[18:58] Honey Wendt: You mean you got a notecard from her, with a private conversation between me and her?
[18:58] Honey Wendt: Please send it to me.
[18:58] Greg Cummings: yes it pissed her off
[18:58] Honey Wendt: This is a violation of community standards.
[18:59] Honey Wendt: I will have to abuse report her for this.
[18:59] Greg Cummings: omg stop plz shes a good person
[18:59] Honey Wendt: You cannot send notecards of private conversations without permission.
[18:59] Honey Wendt: You should have read the community standards before comming to this game.
[18:59] Greg Cummings: i do it all the time
[18:59] Honey Wendt: It's a violation and I am reporting this.
[19:00] Greg Cummings: ok report me im jusyt asking u to stop she did nothing
[19:00] Honey Wendt: http://secondlife.com/corporate/cs.php
[19:00] Honey Wendt: # Disclosure Residents are entitled to a reasonable level of privacy with regard to their Second Lives. Sharing personal information about a fellow Resident --including gender, religion, age, marital status, race, sexual preference, and real-world location beyond what is provided by the Resident in the First Life page of their Resident profile is a violation of that Resident's privacy. Remotely monitoring conversations, posting conversation logs, or sharing conversation logs without consent are all prohibited in Second Life and on the Second Life Forums.
[19:00] Greg Cummings: ok so if i sent u a note card calling u names u wouldnt send to ur bf or gf ?
[19:01] Honey Wendt: What do you mean? This is SecondLife, the conversation was a private conversation between me and her. I have every right to the conversation.
[19:01] Honey Wendt: If that was disclosed without my prior permission, it violates the CS.
[19:01] Honey Wendt: And thus I'm abuse reporting her for this.
[19:01] Greg Cummings: and so do i shes my woman and all the stuff u said is untrue
[19:01] Honey Wendt: That is of no concern to me.
[19:02] Greg Cummings: ok il send this because its not true
[19:02] Honey Wendt: You are also violating her right to be here. You just disclosed to me her RL sex.
[19:02] Honey Wendt: After having posted you the Dislosure statement.
[19:02] Honey Wendt: This is not cool. Please read the Community Standards.
[19:02] Greg Cummings: omg shell tell u shes a woman
[19:02] Honey Wendt: I do not wish to know this, neither did I ask you of this.
[19:03] Honey Wendt: It does nothing to my rights being violated. And my conversation being given to you without my prior permission.
[19:03] Honey Wendt: You a 3rd party who is in no way involved in any conversation I had with her.
[19:04] Greg Cummings: i live with her
[19:04] Honey Wendt: I don't care this is Second Life.
[19:04] Honey Wendt: What is her fulll name in Second Life, I have to put it for this AR.
[19:04] Greg Cummings: ok but i seen it on hher screen thats not cool we have 3 kids
[19:05] Honey Wendt: That does not concern me, and I suggest you think before typing.
[19:05] Honey Wendt: She has violated the Non-discolure community standard and I'll see to it that it's reported.
[19:05] Greg Cummings: lol i seen it on her screen she did no such thing
[19:05] Honey Wendt: Is there anything else you wish to tell me?
[19:06] Honey Wendt: What are you speaking of? She gave you my conversation with her. This is what I'm AR'ing.
[19:06] Greg Cummings: yes plz stop saying that stuff about her
[19:06] Greg Cummings: she didnt give to me did i send it 2 u? no im sitting at her pc
[19:07] Honey Wendt: What stuff are you talking about?
[19:07] Greg Cummings: hmm u know what u wrote im looking at it
[19:07] Honey Wendt: I'm asking you what I wrote.
[19:08] Honey Wendt: If you can't tell me then what's the use. You should read the community standards and rules before violating mine.
[19:08] Honey Wendt: I have abuse reported her for discolsure, and giving you a private conversation I had with her.
[19:08] Honey Wendt: Goodbye.
[19:09] Greg Cummings: i said im sitting at her computer and ill report u right now for lying
[19:10] Honey Wendt: For lying? There is no rule against lying and when did I lie? When you accuse someone do please tell me what I'm accused of in more detail
[19:10] Honey Wendt: I'm going to post this log all over the net. You are parnoid and totally childish.
[19:11] Greg Cummings: ur accusing some1 of something they didnt do so ur in the wrong but ill send it right now thank you
[19:11] Greg Cummings: lol ill sue u go ahead
[19:11] Honey Wendt: Explain this, it was you who told me that you got a notecard of my private conversation wtih that person.
[19:11] Honey Wendt: From that I know the CS was violated.
[19:12] Honey Wendt: I don't have to cute and paste you saying this right? It's right above.
[19:12] Greg Cummings: cause im sitting here looking at it at my gf'bf computer so u cant comtrol that
[19:13] Honey Wendt: You have changed your story, first it was you got a notecard from so and so. But sadly, I'm no longer interested in this conversation as it's childish and going in circles. Go vent out elsewhere, you obviously have sad conversational skills and logic.
[19:13] Honey Wendt: You are muted as well.
[19:14] Greg Cummings: lol ok ill go after u 2 for harring her

Ok folks, he's coming for me! I am soooooooooooooooooooooooo scared!!!

Yes, I was in serious cat mode:



One strange thing he said was the following:

[19:04] Greg Cummings: i live with her
[19:04] Honey Wendt: I don't care this is Second Life.
[snip]
[19:04] Greg Cummings: ok but i seen it on hher screen thats not cool we have 3 kids

Looking at Sunshine Garmes profile, I could see that those kids are clearly the SL kind, and not RL kind as Greg was suggesting.

I am Mommie to 3 Great Kids here in SL. (Crazy, Ellen, Joi) I am excited to be part of all of their experiances. I love them all Dearly!

This makes me wonder just how distorted reality is for these age-players.